- From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:29:19 -0800
- To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1 I support the proposal to drop the set/get-attribute operation styles. -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -----Original Message----- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:23 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: PROPOSAL: Drop set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles I'd like to propose that we drop the set-attribute and get-attribute operation styles. This is motivated by a change in how IBM views the relationship between state and services. In the past, we had envisioned a rather tight or close relationship between a service and the state it may manipulate. We've evolved our thinking on that and now believe that services may operate on one or more resources, but that the service and the resources (state) it operates on are inherently distinct entities. Based on this, the approach for attributes that we advocated before does not make sense or is at best unnecessary. We no longer see the need for it and do not intend to support them. We believe there are better ways to express the metadata about the resources the service manipulates. We also believe that the new refined view of the relationship between services and resources needs to be reflected in the attribute user community, in particular GGF and WSDM. We're working to do that via our reps in those groups. Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 15:28:48 UTC