Thursday, 1 May 1997
Wednesday, 30 April 1997
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Visual Feedback
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- If
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Visual Feedback (was Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD)
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: SUB and SUP
- SUB and SUP
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
Tuesday, 29 April 1997
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Re: Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
- Strange definition of Frame in Cougar DTD
Monday, 28 April 1997
Friday, 25 April 1997
- Re: CSS, no print and no source
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: RFD: Adding alias names to links and resources in HTML
- CSS, no print and no source
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: <LI><P> in AOLpress 2.0
Thursday, 24 April 1997
- Re: <LI><P> in AOLpress 2.0
- Re: RFD: Adding alias names to links and resources in HTML documents
- RFD: Adding alias names to links and resources in HTML documents
- Re: <LI><P> in AOLpress 2.0
- usemap displayed
- map displayed in img
- Re: <LI><P> in AOLpress 2.0
- <LI><P> in AOLpress 2.0
Wednesday, 23 April 1997
- Re: What happened with <td width=> in Cougar?
- What happened with <td width=> in Cougar?
- Wednesday's <NEWS> is here..
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- Re: HTML Metadata for other Web objects
- FREE INFORMATION
- selction lists with many fields
- Re: CGI Problems in MS EXPLORER
Tuesday, 22 April 1997
- CGI Problems in MS EXPLORER
- Re: Page redirection
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- FREE INFORMATION
Monday, 21 April 1997
Friday, 21 February 1997
Monday, 21 April 1997
Sunday, 20 April 1997
- Free Money
- Important message from I.S.P.O.T.
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Re: mime-type confusion
- Re: mime-type confusion
- Re: Combined DTD - 3.2 + CSS1? (fwd)
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
Saturday, 19 April 1997
- DSSSL
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
- Re: A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
Friday, 18 April 1997
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Tables, paragraphs, and structure (was Re: colours for bullets...)
- HiTMeLive - the Live / Real -Time HTML editor
- Re: META question...
- Re: META question... (fwd)
- A Proposal from the Disabled Access Community
Thursday, 17 April 1997
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Tables, paragraphs, and structure (was Re: colours for bullets...)
- Re: META question...
- HELLO
- Re: META question...
- Tables, paragraphs, and structure (was Re: colours for bullets...)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Hyphenation (was Re: A suggested tag)
- Re: A suggested tag
- The soft hyphen (SHY) is useless in HTML
- A meta-tag to define a document's volatility
- Re: Table Syntax (was Re: some more interesting effects ...
- What you've been asking for...
- Re: Combined DTD - 3.2 + CSS1? (fwd)
Wednesday, 16 April 1997
- Re: META question... (fwd)
- Re: Table Syntax (was Re: some more interesting effects ...)
- Re: Combined DTD - 3.2 + CSS1? (fwd)
- Re: META question...
- Re: PROFILE as HEAD attribute
- Re: META question...
- Re: MIRROR for external entity references in XML?
- Re: Handling relocated anchors...
- Re: some more interesting effects - was: Re: colours for bullets
- Re: Table Syntax (was Re: some more interesting effects ...)
- Re: <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: some more interesting effects - was: Re: colours for bullets
- Re: META question...
- Re: some more interesting effects - was: Re: colours for bullets
- Re: META question...
- Table Syntax (was Re: some more interesting effects ...)
- Handling relocated anchors...
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: MIRROR for external entity references in XML?
- some more interesting effects - was: Re: colours for bullets
- MIRROR for external entity references in XML?
- DOM (Document Object Model) (fwd)
- META question... (fwd)
- Re: PROFILE as HEAD attribute
Tuesday, 15 April 1997
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: PROFILE as HEAD attribute
- Re: PROFILE as HEAD attribute
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: META question...
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- META question...
- Re: colours for bullets - this one is simple, works, & addresses
- Re: PROFILE as HEAD attribute
Sunday, 13 April 1997
Tuesday, 15 April 1997
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
Monday, 14 April 1997
- fw:Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- W3C process for new features [was: colours for bullets]
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- Re: colours for bullets
- colours for bullets
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
Friday, 14 March 1997
Sunday, 13 April 1997
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: ISO and HTML (fwd)
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags
- Re: <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags
- What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags (fwd)
- Re: ISO and HTML (fwd)
- <MATH> implementation (was Re: ISO and HTML)
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
Saturday, 12 April 1997
- Apology about "WHICH CODE" messages
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
Friday, 11 April 1997
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: Effects of Mixing CSS anf <FONT> tag?
- Re: Help with MS IE
- Re: Cougar Critique - style WD defined nonstandard HTTP header?
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: Help with MS IE
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: A suggested tag
- Re: Cougar Critique - style WD defined nonstandard HTTP header?
- A suggested tag
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: Cougar Critique - style WD defined nonstandard HTTP header?
- Re: Help with MS IE
- Help with MS IE
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- What ever happened to <person>, <abbrev> etc. tags
Thursday, 10 April 1997
- Re: HTML 4.0?
- Re: Cougar Critique - style WD defined nonstandard HTTP header?
- Re: Effects of Mixing CSS anf <FONT> tag?
- Re: Cougar Critique - style WD defined nonstandard HTTP header?
- Re: Effects of Mixing CSS anf <FONT> tag?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Re: WHICH HTML-CODE is better to use?
- Effects of Mixing CSS anf <FONT> tag?
- Sgml-lex: wrong hyperlinks in draft text.
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: "Mailto" Command
Wednesday, 9 April 1997
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: HTML 4.0?
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- RE: "Mailto" Command
- Re: ISO and HTML
- HTML 4.0?
Tuesday, 8 April 1997
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: ISO-HTML BDO-SPAN
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: Mathematical extensions to ISO-HTML
Monday, 7 April 1997
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: Mathematical extensions to ISO-HTML
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Re: "Mailto" Command
Sunday, 6 April 1997
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- ISO-HTML BDO-SPAN
- Re: HTML "include": see WD-object [was: HTTP Connection Management]
Saturday, 5 April 1997
Friday, 4 April 1997
- Re: "Mailto" Command
- Cougar Critique - frames WD
- Cougar Critique - general
- Mathematical extensions to ISO-HTML
- Location of ISO-HTML
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
Thursday, 3 April 1997
- CSS Printing Extensions
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- RE: ISO and HTML
- RE: ISO and HTML
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
Wednesday, 2 April 1997
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML (fwd)
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Critique of the ISO-HTML draft
- Call for Papers - 11th Unicode Conference - September 1997, California
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML
- Re: ISO and HTML