- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 05:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Sun, 13 Apr 1997, Abigail wrote: > ++ Why then not put <MATH> back in. This is a requirement of many of > ++ us. Its absence is the main reason that 3.2 is inadequate. > > What's the point of putting <MATH> in? It has been clear that browser > authors aren't interested in developing MATH support. (Of course not, > neither commercial websites nor Joe Q. User is interested in it). We make do with "inline" notation: 2^(1/12) or 2**(1/12) to represent the twelfth root of two (1.0594630947, the ratio of a musical note's frequency to the note a semitone below it in the equal-tempered, 12-tone chromatic scale), for example. > Putting MATH back in won't change that. Wouldn't an <applet> be best? All we really need is a Java applet that can take an inline formula as a parameter, parse it (perhaps with some hints), and generate a typeset image of the formula, along with a textbox showing the original inline version for copy+paste purposes. Maybe it could even toggle between graphic and text display, though I don't know enough about Java to say whether a paint area and text area could swap positions or not. __________________________________________________________________________ Walter Ian Kaye <boo@best.com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Sunday, 13 April 1997 08:13:46 UTC