- From: Ingo Macherius <Ingo.Macherius@tu-clausthal.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 23:35:39 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: liam@htmlhelp.com (Liam Quinn)
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Liam Quinn said: | > A suggested tag: something like <w> for word split | | A soft hyphen entity, ­, was proposed in HTML 2.0, though I don't | think many (if any) browsers actually support it. Think of HTML processing by ESIS events. A tag could be processed on event level, while an entity would have to be mapped on a character an then processed on content level. With the <w> solution there is the problem of determining word begin/end. Com<w> mu<w> ni<w> ca<w> tor could not easily be determined as a single word. So to make it bullet proof word ending/beginnings would have to be tagged, too. E.g. <word>Com<w>mu<w>ni<w>ca<w>tor</word> | Optimally, browsers would have a dictionary of words and their proper | hyphenation, This would impose the necessarity to have multi langual dictionaries installed on any client machine. With the supposed tag such would be needed on the providers machine. I donīt think this tag would be used by authors, but would be inserted by post processing scripts. | but since they can't even support justified text, | thinking about hyphenation is a bit premature. Isnīt hyphenation a way to properly justified documents ? IMHO first there is hyphenation, then there is justification. ++im -- Snail : Ingo Macherius // L'Aigler Platz 4 // D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld Mail : Ingo.Macherius@tu-clausthal.de WWW: http://www.tu-clausthal.de/~inim/ Information!=Knowledge!=Wisdom!=Truth!=Beauty!=Love!=Music==BEST (Frank Zappa)
Received on Friday, 11 April 1997 17:35:47 UTC