- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 14:31:52 -0500
- To: "Robert Rothenburg 'Walking-Owl'" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Please consider sending a review comment on the recent working draft on linking[1] to the editors as per [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-htmllink [2] http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Cougar/ Robert Rothenburg 'Walking-Owl' wrote: > > There's a variety of choices to handle moved pages, but what if > someone puts a link to http://www.any-site.com/foo.html#bar where > foo.html is still there, but the anchor "bar" has moved (say when > that section is large enough to merit it's own page at bar.html)? > > A simple kluge is to put a <a name="bar">Moved</a> message for pages > that link to that section, but it would be nice to mark a referral > for an anchor that functions like Refresh in HTTPD headers: > > <a name="bar" refer-href="bar.html"> > > So that any links to foo.html#bar are referred to bar.html. I suggest you consider using link relationships, ala: <a name="bar" href="bar.html" rel="redirect">moved</a> -- Dan Connolly, W3C Architecture Domain Lead <connolly@w3.org> +1 512 310-2971 http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ PGP:EDF8 A8E4 F3BB 0F3C FD1B 7BE0 716C FF21
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 1997 15:31:57 UTC