- From: Ingo Macherius <Ingo.Macherius@tu-clausthal.de>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 00:59:25 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod)
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Paul Prescod said: | Ingo Macherius wrote: | > This would impose the necessarity to have multi langual dictionaries | > installed on any client machine. With the supposed tag such would be ne= | eded | As long as it is a server side, why not just point to hyphenation | dictionary customized with the words in the document (or perhaps the | site)? On WWW6 Mbone submissions there was a speech today concerning processing documents *in* the proxy. I guess this is be a problem that could be very well solved this way. So the proxy has the dictionairs and inserts <w>-like tags. Just a thought ... | #1. That wouldn't mutiliate the HTML. Right. But in some cases (just think of the standard poetry example) it may be unwanted to have hyphenation. So some kind of markup *is* needed. This may be reduced to someting like <p hyphenation>, if dictionaries are used. | #3. No change to HTML would be necessary -- use LINK. Not even this would be needed. Content-Language and the LANG attributes should be enough. The LINK may be used to point to additional dictionairs, e.g. technical ones. | #5. A dictionary based approach is the right one in the long run, even | if the dictionaries must reside on the client machine, so we might as | well move in that direction. After reading your arguments: Agreed. But something like a common dictionary format needs vendor decisions. Hope they´ll do. ++im -- Snail : Ingo Macherius // L'Aigler Platz 4 // D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld Mail : Ingo.Macherius@tu-clausthal.de WWW: http://www.tu-clausthal.de/~inim/ Information!=Knowledge!=Wisdom!=Truth!=Beauty!=Love!=Music==BEST (Frank Zappa)
Received on Friday, 11 April 1997 18:59:31 UTC