- From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:52:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com> wrote: >On 11 Apr 97 at 22:31, Kenneth Christiansen wrote: > >> A suggested tag: something like <w> >> for word split > >A soft hyphen entity, ­, was proposed in HTML 2.0, though I don't >think many (if any) browsers actually support it. Some show a >hyphen, but I'm not aware of any that actually treat it as a soft >hyphen. Lynx implement handling of ­ as a soft hyphen several years ago. The problem with using it in markup, though, is that browsers which don't support it end up displaying "­" within the text. Even if other browsers don't bother to implement ­, it would help a lot it they'd as least recongnize and add code to ignore it. Since they haven't bothered to do that either, one advantage of a tag "something like <w>", or <hyphen> which was proposed a number of times, is that it would automatically be ignored as an unkown tag by the old browsers, and those whose developers choose to rely solely on a dictionary, or are unconcerned about support for soft hyphens. Fote ========================================================================= Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 =========================================================================
Received on Friday, 11 April 1997 17:53:25 UTC