- From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@hesketh.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 02:37:55 -0400
- To: Jukka Korpela <jkorpela@cc.hut.fi>, www-html@w3.org
At 09:12 AM 4/30/97 +0300, Jukka Korpela graced us with: > Thus, I think it should be make clear whether SUB and SUP are > intended to be used for stylistic presentation only, and if they > are, explicitly state that they should not be used for exponents in > mathematical expressions or in other contexts where it might change > the meaning of a piece of text if SUB and SUP elements were presented > as normal text. For some of the examples you site, such as superscripted exponents, there are entities whose meaning is clear, such as superscript two ² ² --> ² ² --> ² superscript three ³ ³ --> ³ ³ --> ³ cf. <URL:http://www.uni-passau.de/~ramsch/iso8859-1.html> What is the status of HTML-Math? All I could find at <URL:http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/> was a link to the Sept96 meeting of the HTML-Math SIG... <URL:http://www.ams.org/html-math/meeting-960930-notes.html> Whoa! Spoke too soon: <URL:http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Math/> It looks like something is happening here. Steve Steve -- Steven Champeon | Negative forces have value. http://www.hesketh.com/schampeo | - Henry Adams
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 1997 02:38:40 UTC