www-dom@w3.org from October to December 1999 by date

Wednesday, 29 December 1999

• Re: DOM Range comments David Brownell
• Re: Again new comments on DOM Range keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Range comments keshlam@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 28 December 1999

• Another DOM Range comment Thierry Kormann
• Again new comments on DOM Range Thierry Kormann
• Still some DOM Range comments Thierry Kormann
• DOM Range comments Thierry Kormann

Sunday, 26 December 1999

• Re: Xpath and DOM uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com

Tuesday, 21 December 1999

• Notes on DOM L2 CR David Brownell

Monday, 20 December 1999

• Re: Question about DOM2 Range Lauren Wood
• ANN: 4DOM 0.9.0 Uche Ogbuji
• Question about DOM2 Range Kollár Lajos

Sunday, 19 December 1999

• Re: DOM DOM binding and free software Philippe Le Hegaret
• DOM DOM binding and free software Richard Stallman

Wednesday, 15 December 1999

• Concrete proposal for MVC-capable DOM event flow Raph Levien

Friday, 17 December 1999

• Re: help on DOM programming Arnaud Le Hors

Thursday, 16 December 1999

• help on DOM programming Jian Chen
• Re: NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument Lauren Wood
• Re: xmlns & createElementNS Lauren Wood
• NAMESPACE_ERR missing from createDoctype and createDocument Arnaud Le Hors
• xmlns & createElementNS Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 15 December 1999

• some confusion with the 'all' medium Bill dehOra

Tuesday, 14 December 1999

• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] Eric Richardson
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] John Cowan
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] Philippe Le Hegaret

Monday, 13 December 1999

• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] John Cowan
• Re: DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source] Eric Richardson

Friday, 10 December 1999

• Call for Implementations: Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Becomes W3C Candidate Recommendation Janet Daly
• Re: planned Level 3 modules Lauren Wood

Thursday, 9 December 1999

• Re: planned Level 3 modules Ray D. Whitmer
• Re: planned Level 3 modules keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Level 2 Last Call comments David Brownell
• Re: planned Level 3 modules David Brownell
• Re: planned Level 3 modules Brad Clawsie
• planned Level 3 modules Lauren Wood
• DOM Level 2 Last Call comments Lauren Wood

Wednesday, 8 December 1999

• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 David Brownell
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? David Brownell

Monday, 6 December 1999

• Re: namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" keshlam@us.ibm.com
• namespace name for default attributes of prefix "xml:" Takuki Kamiya

Saturday, 4 December 1999

• Re: DOM tree into a XML document ? keshlam@us.ibm.com

Friday, 3 December 1999

• DOM ECMAScript Tests Mary Brady
• DOM tree into a XML document ? MICHAEL.SARTORI@DLH.DE

Monday, 29 November 1999

• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: How to get info out of DOM tree? keshlam@us.ibm.com

Friday, 26 November 1999

• How to get info out of DOM tree? Jeff Lu
• New 4Suite mailing list uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 Garret Wilson
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source Lauren Wood

Thursday, 25 November 1999

• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 Garret Wilson
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Lauren Wood
• Re: splitText() Lauren Wood
• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 Lauren Wood
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: Node.replaceChild with newChild being a DocumentFragment Lauren Wood
• Re: New DOM Level 2 Working Draft Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 Philippe Le Hegaret
• Node.replaceChild with newChild being a DocumentFragment Takuki Kamiya

Wednesday, 24 November 1999

• Tow questions about dom event model wq
• Re: DOM L2 RFE Lauren Wood

Tuesday, 23 November 1999

• comments/questions/suggestions/bug reports for DOM Level 2 Garret Wilson

Monday, 22 November 1999

• Interacting with a DOM XML parser. Carl Thronson
• How do I get off this list? Russ Heithoff

Friday, 19 November 1999

• Re: DOM L2 RFE David Brownell
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM L2 RFE Ray D. Whitmer
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM Daniel Glazman
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM L2 RFE keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: Methods Request keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: compatibility with the DOM Level 0 keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: Methods Request Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: compatibility with the DOM Level 0 Michael Champion
• compatibility with the DOM Level 0 Ramin Danaei-Boroumand

Wednesday, 17 November 1999

• Methods Request Andrew n marshall

Friday, 19 November 1999

• UML diagrams of the DOM Bill dehOra
• Re: Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM stefano debenedetti
• Proposal for bootstrapable DOM and CSSOM Daniel Glazman

Thursday, 18 November 1999

• Re: DOM L2 RFE David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 RFE keshlam@us.ibm.com
• DOM L2 RFE David Brownell

Wednesday, 17 November 1999

• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM David Brownell
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM Philippe Le Hegaret
• DOM-Level-2-19991029 CSS OM Bill dehOra

Tuesday, 16 November 1999

• Re: DOM RFEs Lauren Wood
• DOM RFEs David Brownell
• CSS: resolved and unresolved issues. Philippe Le Hegaret

Wednesday, 10 November 1999

• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates againstopen source keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: New DOM Level 2 Working Draft Vidur Apparao

Tuesday, 9 November 1999

• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against opensource David Brownell
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates againstopen source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source David Brownell
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source Ken MacLeod
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful,discriminates against open source David Brownell
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source David Brownell
• Re: question about DOM level 1 ordering of children Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source Lauren Wood
• DOM DOM binding considered harmful, discriminates against open source John Cowan
• question about DOM level 1 ordering of children Chris Harris
• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings keshlam@us.ibm.com

Monday, 8 November 1999

• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings Junaid Hasan
• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings Stephane Bortzmeyer

Friday, 5 November 1999

• Intent to make a Debian package with DOM Java bindings Stephane Bortzmeyer

Thursday, 4 November 1999

• Re: splitText() and well-formedness keshlam@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 3 November 1999

• Re: splitText() David Brownell
• Re: TransformNode method keshlam@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 2 November 1999

• Re: TransformNode method Michael Champion
• TransformNode method Stephan Selle

Monday, 1 November 1999

• Re: splitText() keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: What is returned by Document.getLocalName() ? KAZUMI Saito
• What is returned by Document.getLocalName() ? KAZUMI Saito

Saturday, 30 October 1999

• splitText() L. David Baron

Friday, 29 October 1999

• Re: looking for interesting DOM applications Lauren Wood
• Re: looking for interesting DOM applications L. David Baron
• looking for interesting DOM applications Lauren Wood
• Remove Philip Siniscalchi

Wednesday, 27 October 1999

• Re: DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" Philippe Le Hegaret
• DOM level 2 StyleSheets : What means "binding-specific casting methods" Lee Hyoung Moon
• Re: Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a sthe Level 1 interfaces? David Brownell

Monday, 25 October 1999

• Re: Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a s the Level 1 interfaces? Ray D. Whitmer

Sunday, 24 October 1999

• Any reason that the Level 2 interfaces have the EXACT SAME NAME a s the Level 1 interfaces? Box, Don

Thursday, 21 October 1999

• ANN: 4DOM 0.8.2 uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com

Thursday, 14 October 1999

• Re: Rearranging rows in a table L. David Baron

Wednesday, 13 October 1999

• Rearranging rows in a table Jeff Fink

Thursday, 14 October 1999

• Re: Possible bug in specification of Element.setAttributeNS Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: xml declaration keshlam@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 12 October 1999

• Possible bug in specification of Element.setAttributeNS David Ziegler

Wednesday, 13 October 1999

• xml declaration Daniel Glazman

Monday, 11 October 1999

• Re: Combining two trees Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Ray D. Whitmer
• DOM serialization Tangi Vass
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky

Friday, 8 October 1999

• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Paul Prescod
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Paul
• Combining two trees Daniel Noguerol
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments on DOM level 2 keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Comments on DOM level 2 Rick Jelliffe

Thursday, 7 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Tim Taylor

Friday, 8 October 1999

• Sorry! I was out of scope www-dom mailing list questions. SeongCheol Kim
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Ray D. Whitmer
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Steve Ball

Thursday, 7 October 1999

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Re: Liveness (NodeList, Traversal) Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Liveness (NodeList, Traversal) David Brownell
• DOM LC suggestions (was Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Re: Live NodeLists (Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Live NodeLists (Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Kasper Peeters
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Extending the DOM Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Michael Champion
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method John Bradley
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method John Bradley
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Sean Mc Grath
• Hi! Can Linux g++(C++ compiler) make reentrant binary? (like a Win-NT DLL) SeongCheol Kim
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Takuki Kamiya
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Steve Ball

Wednesday, 6 October 1999

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Making the DOM a more useful libaray API (was Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library!) Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky

Tuesday, 5 October 1999

• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Christian Roth
• Re: DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method David Brownell
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• DOM Level 2 needs getElementById method Michael Champion
• Re: The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Michael Champion
• The DOM is not a model, it is a library! Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various John G. Spragge
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: Events ordering: Largely undefined? David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various John Cowan
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Events ordering: Largely undefined? keshlam@us.ibm.com

Monday, 4 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Jeff Mackay

Tuesday, 5 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors
• RE: DOM L2 comments, various Jeff Mackay
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various John G. Spragge

Monday, 4 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various John Cowan
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various John Cowan
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Jeff Mackay
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Jeff Mackay
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Stephen R. Savitzky
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Arnaud Le Hors

Saturday, 2 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell

Friday, 1 October 1999

• Re: DOM L2 comments, various Lauren Wood
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various keshlam@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM L2 comments, various David Brownell
• Re: [Fwd: DOM Level 2 implementation/Java] uche@ieee.org
• [Fwd: DOM Level 2 implementation/Java] David Brownell

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 December 1999 21:52:38 UTC