- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 14:46:29 -0700
- To: www-dom@w3.org
keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote: > > So far, ASP syntax is the best argument I've heard for extending > the node types. Not really. ASP is structurally not markup -- it's <%foo...%> constructs, or equivalent, with text that doesn't need to obey markup rules. Or it was the last time I looked at it in detail. > Parsing the content of a <script> _doesn't_ do it for me. It's just an "Element" after all. Maybe HTMLScriptElement. Node type is ELEMENT_NODE. > Re low-memory/large-document: Remember that the DOM is only an API; > how the data is stored behind it is up to the implementation. There > is room for cleverness and tradeoffs here. Not a whole lot of such room, though; the API has a bit too much "stuff" in it. - Dave
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 17:47:39 UTC