- From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 10:34:49 -0800
- To: <www-dom@w3.org>
On 26 Nov 99, at 1:01, Takuki Kamiya wrote: > DOM L2 WD (as well as L1 spec indeed) appears to fail to be clear as to > what behavior to be expected when Node.replaceChild is invoked with its > newChild being a DocumentFragment. Other methods such as insertBefore > and appendChild are explicitly stated as being aware of DocumentFragment > on the other hand. > > I suggest that DOM L2 be specific on this point. > I know of DOM implementations which behaves differently upon the operation > described above: one raises HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR exception, the other > succeeds so that the net result is the same as if removeChild was > called following insertBefore. This is not apparently a desirable > situation for DOM interoperability thus needs to be explicitly described > in the spec one way or the other. I believe the intent was for replaceChild to be consistent with the other methods and not raise an exception; I will raise this with the WG. Thanks, Lauren
Received on Thursday, 25 November 1999 13:39:56 UTC