- From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:03:42 -0400
- To: www-dom@w3.org
> Again, runtime type ID (as opposed to runtime type *tests*) is not > enough. I know; I've experimented with the same kind of implementation. But either lack of RTTI _or_ classes that implement multiple interfaces would be sufficient to establish the need for nodeType, and I didn't want to bring up the latter because some folks argue "but you shouldn't have done it that way". ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 17:04:04 UTC