Fwd: Doodle Poll to restart ConnegP and Profiles sub-Groups
RDF-star on YouTube
Agenda 23 Februrary 2023 - report on use cases process proposal and next steps
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
agenda and minutes for working group meetings
Editor's call February 22
changes between RDF 1.1 documents and 1.2 FPWD documents
multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity
- Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity
- Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
- Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
- Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
- Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory
Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
- Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples
Semantic Predication: 3 - worked out basic example
Semantic Predication: 2 - examples
Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions
- Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions
- Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions
- Re: [External] : Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions
- Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions
acronyms and systems
Use Cases: two examples of use cases
noting editorial changes to documents
[Text-Direction] New Wiki page.
Use Cases: proposed use case process
Use Cases: WG task force for use cases
approving pull requests for working group documents
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
Agenda 2023-02-09
Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call
Odp: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call
[Editors] Upcoming Editor's call
- Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call
- Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call
- Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call
Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call
Re: What is RDFn?
Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call
RDF repositories ready for work
Re: Future-Proofing for Transition to Multi-Edge caused by Data Arrival
Scheduling an editors call
conserving meeting time
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
best source for information about the RDF-star working group
Reification and Entailment
Event Invitation: RDF-star WG
Event Updated: RDF-star WG
Revisiting referential opacity - a proposal
Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?
- Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?
- Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?
Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- On the TEP semantic extension [was: Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)]
- Re: On the TEP semantic extension [was: Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)]
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)
- Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)