- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:15:08 +0000
- To: Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- Cc: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 22/02/2023 13:53, Thomas Lörtsch wrote:
>
>
>> On 18. Feb 2023, at 23:39, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>>
...
>> Quoted triples are a building block, not a complete solution for all use cases.
>
>
> tl;dr
> We can’t have too many different building blocks, so the art is to design them in the right way. And don’t forget that we have two building blocks already: quoted triples and the shortcut syntax. The latter could very well have a more "main path" semantics, like: already refer to a referentially transparent occurrence (which is of course asserted).
Is that a proposal that complete semantics happens when the target
triple is available, and not by default if a quoted triple in a graph
without the target triple asserted? In other words the "semantics" is
due to the triple, not the naming of the triple.
Andy
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2023 13:15:26 UTC