public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from February 2023 by author

Addison Phillips

• RE: [Text-Direction] New Wiki page. (Friday, 10 February)

Adrian Gschwend

• Re: RDF-star on YouTube (Monday, 27 February)
• Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: What is RDFn? (Sunday, 5 February)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: changes between RDF 1.1 documents and 1.2 FPWD documents (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 2 - examples (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: noting editorial changes to documents (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Use cases: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Use cases: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2? (Wednesday, 1 February)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)

ddooss@wp.pl

• Odp: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Tuesday, 7 February)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Franconi Enrico

• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Friday, 24 February)
• RDF-star on YouTube (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 2 - examples (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Semantic Predication: 3 - worked out basic example (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Semantic Predication: 2 - examples (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Tuesday, 14 February)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Editor's call February 22 (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: [Text-Direction] New Wiki page. (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: noting editorial changes to documents (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: [Text-Direction] New Wiki page. (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: noting editorial changes to documents (Thursday, 9 February)
• [Text-Direction] New Wiki page. (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: RDF repositories ready for work (Friday, 3 February)
• RDF repositories ready for work (Friday, 3 February)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 2 February)

James Anderson

• Re: On the TEP semantic extension [was: Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)] (Thursday, 9 February)

Lassila, Ora

• Re: agenda and minutes for working group meetings (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2? (Wednesday, 1 February)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF 1.2 profiles (Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Ora Lassila (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 23 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 16 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 16 February)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 2 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 2 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: agenda and minutes for working group meetings (Thursday, 23 February)
• Agenda 23 Februrary 2023 - report on use cases process proposal and next steps (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: agenda and minutes for working group meetings (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: agenda and minutes for working group meetings (Thursday, 23 February)
• agenda and minutes for working group meetings (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Editor's call February 22 (Saturday, 18 February)
• changes between RDF 1.1 documents and 1.2 FPWD documents (Saturday, 18 February)
• Use Cases: proposed use case process (Thursday, 16 February)
• Use Cases: WG task force for use cases [second call for participation] (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• acronyms and systems (Friday, 10 February)
• Use Cases: two examples of use cases (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Use Cases: proposed use case process (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Use Cases: proposed use case process (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: What is RDFn? (Friday, 10 February)
• noting editorial changes to documents (Thursday, 9 February)
• Use Cases: proposed use case process (Thursday, 9 February)
• Use Cases: WG task force for use cases (Thursday, 9 February)
• approving pull requests for working group documents (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Use cases: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Odp: [Editors] Upcoming Editor's call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: What is RDFn? (Sunday, 5 February)
• conserving meeting time (Thursday, 2 February)
• best source for information about the RDF-star working group (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Fwd: Doodle Poll to restart ConnegP and Profiles sub-Groups (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: noting editorial changes to documents (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: [Text-Direction] New Wiki page. (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: noting editorial changes to documents (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: What is RDFn? (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Scheduling an editors call (Friday, 3 February)
• Scheduling an editors call (Thursday, 2 February)
• RDF 1.2 profiles (Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Pierre-Antoine Champin (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 9 February)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call (Monday, 6 February)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star editors call (Friday, 3 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 2 February)

Souripriya Das

• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: [External] : Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Thursday, 16 February)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Agenda 2023-02-09 (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG (Thursday, 2 February)

Thomas Lörtsch

• Re: RDF-star on YouTube (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 1 - basic distinctions (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Use Cases: proposed use case process (Friday, 10 February)
• On the TEP semantic extension [was: Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?)] (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: Future-Proofing for Transition to Multi-Edge caused by Data Arrival (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Revisiting RDF-star semantics (was Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2?) (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Why is the RDF-star working group standardising RDF 1.2 and SPARQL 1.2? (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Revisiting referential opacity - a proposal (Wednesday, 1 February)

Timothée Haudebourg

• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Semantic Predication: 4 - more worked out examples (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: Future-Proofing for Transition to Multi-Edge caused by Data Arrival (Thursday, 2 February)
• Reification and Entailment (Thursday, 2 February)

Vladimir Alexiev

• Re: Semantic Predication: 5 - model theory (Thursday, 23 February)
• multiple kinds of transparency; simplicity over complexity (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Use Cases: two examples of use cases (Thursday, 16 February)

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2023 22:00:55 UTC