Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance

I like that term (“classic”), but what would replace “strong”?

Ora


From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
Cc: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>, "Lassila, Ora" <ora@amazon.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
Resent-From: <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.



Is there a way to call it "classic" rather than "weak"?

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, 13:16 Antoine Zimmermann, <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr<mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>> wrote:
I added a comment to the Github issue on proposing 2 types of
conformance. Please check this if you are interested by the topic:

https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504


I propose 2 options that we can discuss today.
--
Antoine Zimmermann
École des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
CS 62362
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 49 97 02
http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/