- From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:44:08 +0000
- To: "franconi@inf.unibz.it" <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Hi Enrico, On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 09:57 +0000, Franconi Enrico wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2023, at 09:54, Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se> wrote: > > [...] > > > [And I understand now that your proposal is to enable users to make > > this intention explicit by giving them two different forms of > > embedded triples (or even a third form for the modal /epistemic > > predication). > > Indeed :-) Okay :-) Now, assuming that we decide to go in this direction, we need such a sy ntactic distinction between different kinds of embedded triples not only for a particular serialization format such a Turtle or N-Tripels, but we actually need a way to capture this distinction directly in the formal/abstract syntax of the data model itself. I am referring to the notion of an RDF-star triple as defined at: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/#dfn-triple Therefore, my next question then is: Do you also have a proposal for how the syntactic distinction between different kinds of embedded triples can be captured in the formal/abstract syntax of the RDF/RDF- star data model? Olaf
Received on Friday, 17 February 2023 13:44:22 UTC