Re: Use cases: Agenda 2023-02-09

Sounds like a task force. c.f. document conversion and errata

So the agenda item is a 5 minute slot to call for volunteers for a TF? 
Ideally with a organiser/contact point.

(Whether the task force is writing use cases or debating a mechanism to 
create good use cases is up to the volunteers.)

     Andy

On 09/02/2023 15:35, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
> I've looked at that document and I find most of the use cases inadequate.
>
> A use case for quoted triples that can be considered by the working 
> group should include at least an example using quoted triples and an 
> explanation of how the quoted triples should work and cover the 
> entirety of the use case.  What is in the document is mostly vague 
> descriptions of desires.
>
>
> Consider the first use case:
>
>
> As a materials scientist working with ontologies. I want to enrich 
> relationships between objects. For example "A --similar--> B" with a 
> similarity measure of 0.5, So that I can identify the pairs of objects 
> with relationships of certain "strength". Visualization of the edges 
> with accordingly weighted thickness would be a huge plus.
>
>
> How is this supposed to work using quoted triples?   What are the 
> boundaries of the use case?
>
> The use case could be handled by adding a mechanism to attach numbers 
> to (quoted) triples.
>
>
> I think the working group needs a mechanism to create good use cases 
> so that the various proposals for quoted triples can be evaluated.
>
>
> peter
>
>
> PS:  Note that this assumes that there is the possibility of having 
> different proposals being considered by the working group.
>
>
> On 2/9/23 10:04, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Previously:
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/2023/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html#t04
>>> https://www.w3.org/2023/01/26-rdf-star-minutes.html#t02
>>
>> CG gathered material:
>> https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/UCR/rdf-star-ucr.html
>>