Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance

The term "weak" is not final at all, so we can definitely change it. 
"Classic" works pretty well, IMHO. Instead of "strong", my proposal was 
"Full".

--AZ

Le 16/02/2023 à 14:35, Lassila, Ora a écrit :
> I like that term (“classic”), but what would replace “strong”?
> 
> Ora
> 
> *From: *Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
> *To: *Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
> *Cc: *"public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>, "Lassila, 
> Ora" <ora@amazon.com>
> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL]Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
> *Resent-From: *<public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
> 
> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do 
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender 
> and know the content is safe.
> 
> Is there a way to call it "classic" rather than "weak"?
> 
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, 13:16 Antoine Zimmermann, 
> <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr <mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>> wrote:
> 
>     I added a comment to the Github issue on proposing 2 types of
>     conformance. Please check this if you are interested by the topic:
> 
>     https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504
>     <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504>
> 
>     I propose 2 options that we can discuss today.
>     -- 
>     Antoine Zimmermann
>     École des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>     158 cours Fauriel
>     CS 62362
>     42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>     France
>     Tél:+33(0)4 77 49 97 02
>     http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/ <http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/>
> 

-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
École des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
CS 62362
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 49 97 02
http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2023 13:58:32 UTC