Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance

I propose 1.1.1 and 1.2.


peter



On 2/16/23 08:58, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> The term "weak" is not final at all, so we can definitely change it. 
> "Classic" works pretty well, IMHO. Instead of "strong", my proposal was "Full".
>
> --AZ
>
> Le 16/02/2023 à 14:35, Lassila, Ora a écrit :
>> I like that term (“classic”), but what would replace “strong”?
>>
>> Ora
>>
>> *From: *Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
>> *Date: *Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
>> *To: *Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
>> *Cc: *"public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>, "Lassila, 
>> Ora" <ora@amazon.com>
>> *Subject: *RE: [EXTERNAL]Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
>> *Resent-From: *<public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
>> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
>>
>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know 
>> the content is safe.
>>
>> Is there a way to call it "classic" rather than "weak"?
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, 13:16 Antoine Zimmermann, <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr 
>> <mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>> wrote:
>>
>>     I added a comment to the Github issue on proposing 2 types of
>>     conformance. Please check this if you are interested by the topic:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504
>> <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504>
>>
>>     I propose 2 options that we can discuss today.
>>     --     Antoine Zimmermann
>>     École des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>>     158 cours Fauriel
>>     CS 62362
>>     42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>>     France
>>     Tél:+33(0)4 77 49 97 02
>> http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/ <http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/>
>>
>