Re: Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance

"experimental". 

Am 16. Februar 2023 14:35:10 MEZ schrieb "Lassila, Ora" <ora@amazon.com>:
>I like that term (“classic”), but what would replace “strong”?
>
>Ora
>
>
>From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
>Date: Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
>To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
>Cc: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>, "Lassila, Ora" <ora@amazon.com>
>Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL]Weak vs Full RDF 1.2 conformance
>Resent-From: <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
>Resent-Date: Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 8:29 AM
>
>
>CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
>Is there a way to call it "classic" rather than "weak"?
>
>On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, 13:16 Antoine Zimmermann, <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr<mailto:antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>> wrote:
>I added a comment to the Github issue on proposing 2 types of
>conformance. Please check this if you are interested by the topic:
>
>https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/19#issuecomment-1433072504
>
>I propose 2 options that we can discuss today.
>--
>Antoine Zimmermann
>École des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>158 cours Fauriel
>CS 62362
>42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>France
>Tél:+33(0)4 77 49 97 02
>http://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/