Re: Agenda 2023-02-09

Indeed, but has anything happened as a result?

peter


On 2/9/23 08:17, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Previously:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2023/02/02-rdf-star-minutes.html#t04
> https://www.w3.org/2023/01/26-rdf-star-minutes.html#t02
>
> On 09/02/2023 11:58, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> I think we need some meeting time to discuss how to start creating useful 
>> use cases.
>>
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/23 04:04, Adrian Gschwend wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Todays agenda so far:
>>>
>>> 1. Scribe
>>> 2. Approve previous call's minutes
>>> 3. Agenda
>>> 4. First Public Working Drafts of the "modernized" RDF 1.1 specs: Update & 
>>> next steps. Related: [1]
>>> 5. RDF vs. RDF-star conformance ("Weak vs. strong", ...): Approval?
>>>
>>>
>>> The chairs are aware that we need to have the discussion on "Revising 
>>> RDF-star semantics" in the meeting as well, but that might take a while. 
>>> Therefore, we propose to focus on the easier tasks today so that we can 
>>> move forward with those.
>>>
>>> Additions are welcome
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF1.1_Errata
>>>
>