- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:42:48 +0000
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 09/02/2023 23:52, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2023, at 3:48 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I see that even typographical changes are noted in the changes
>> sections. It seems to me that this is overkill.
>>
>>
>> I suggest that fixing typographical errors and other minor editorial
>> changes not be noted change sections.
+1
> +1 The historical change logs may have included this. I erred on the
> side of including both historical change logs and contributors, but
> arguably, these can be trimmed back, at least the change log. IMO, only
> normative or large structural changes need to be added to the change log.
Aren't these changes sections for the formal steps of CR->PR->REC
(external review points) which do need to be noted?
Non-trivial, non-normative should be noted for this WG at least because
of the charter. I don't think we will have many such items.
Andy
>
> Gregg
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 10 February 2023 09:43:01 UTC