public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from February 2017 by subject

$this in Aggregations

[ANN] Released JOPA 0.9.2 - Efficient Open-source Java Library to edit RDF/OWL Ontologies

alternative definition of SHACL

behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS

behaviour of ASK-based validators

Comment on Entailment Regimes

Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017

editorial problem in example in 6.1

Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92

Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL

Formal objection to removing features from node shapes

handling recursive shapes in SHACL

information lacking for closed issues

limiting ill-formed nodes in SHACL

loss of functionality

Minor typos in SHACL spec

missing normative reference in SHACL document

New SHACL Working Draft 2017-02-02

notice of non-implementation

on compliance testing for SHACL

on sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint

on value

probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2

probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial

proposed test case for SHACL

qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint

Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs

Review of SHACL document (2)

SHACL Core validator

SHACL draft ready for review

SHACL for OWL2

SHACL syntax in SHACL

Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02

Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Working Draft of 2017-02-02 (shapes portion)

status of SHACL-SPARQL

strange different wording for what is probably the same thing

syntax checking for SHACL

target and property shape

Typo in nodeKind

Union operations on graphs

wrong name for exactly one

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2017 00:17:54 UTC