- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:32:37 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
On 9/02/2017 3:50, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > The result looks better. However the change in the document is not a > clarification, but instead a fix to part of SHACL. Further, the change is > incorrectly described in the revision history. I believe the substance of your issue has been addressed. Thanks again for pointing that out. > > Has the working group signed off on this change to SHACL? It is practically infeasible to ask the WG for permission for every email response that a member is making. In terms of process, we have decided to approve such changes in bulk, whenever the WG votes on publishing a new version. Holger > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications > > On 02/07/2017 05:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Right, this detail got lost in the refactoring when we removed the dependency >> on EXISTS. >> >> I have added clarification here: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/57f407027745663ffb6bcd593152aeb5835e530f >> >> >> Thanks >> Holger >> >> >> On 7/02/2017 17:44, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> Section 6.3 does not correctly describe the execution semantics of ASK-based >>> validators. ASK queries do not return solutions. >>> >>> peter >>> >>> >>> On 02/06/2017 11:25 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>>> Section 6.2 is about the syntax only. The validation semantics are explained >>>> in 6.3. >>>> >>>> Holger >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/02/2017 16:34, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>>> It appears that the non-normative boundary is one paragraph too early in >>>>> Section 6.2.3.2. >>>>> >>>>> peter >>>>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:33:14 UTC