Re: qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:02:05 +1000 To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Message-ID: <a59d2fdb-da0e-fbf4-cb34-a68ce19b5ec0@topquadrant.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC

On 8/02/2017 20:44, Olivier Corby wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > There is no systematic definition of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint
>>
>> This is just a "flag" that IMHO doesn't require further definitions 
>> beside the relationship with sh:qualifiedValueShape. There are syntax 
>> rules however.
>
> I think that qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint deserves a definition as all 
> other statements.

The other definitions are for constraint components. How would a 
definition for sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint look like?

Thanks,
Holger

>
>
> Olivier