Re: on value

• From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
• Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:27:36 +1000
• To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
• Message-ID: <56d2a8f6-a51d-e346-eb06-04a6f20fca7c@topquadrant.com>

I have added a clarification for this case:

https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/abc55fe3380a94f1ae74e3453a904778f36eee6a

I do believe it was rather redundant though because the definition of 
"value" already implied the existence of a subject.

Holger


On 27/02/2017 2:29, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> In several places in the SHACL document there is wording like "Every value
> of sh:shapesGraph is an IRI" with "value" linking back to the definition of
> property values and paths.  However, value is defined there on an RDF term
> and a property, not on a single RDF term.
>
> There needs to be a suitable definition of value added to support these
> uses.
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>

Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 06:33:42 UTC