W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: on value

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:27:36 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <56d2a8f6-a51d-e346-eb06-04a6f20fca7c@topquadrant.com>
I have added a clarification for this case:


I do believe it was rather redundant though because the definition of 
"value" already implied the existence of a subject.


On 27/02/2017 2:29, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> In several places in the SHACL document there is wording like "Every value
> of sh:shapesGraph is an IRI" with "value" linking back to the definition of
> property values and paths.  However, value is defined there on an RDF term
> and a property, not on a single RDF term.
> There needs to be a suitable definition of value added to support these
> uses.
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 06:33:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC