- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:27:03 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
That's a reasonable name. peter On 02/15/2017 03:37 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > The WG has decided to rename sh:xor to sh:xone, as a shortcut for "exactly one". > > Holger > > > On 15/02/2017 3:14, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> If there has to be an explanation that the name chosen for something means >> something else everywhere else, then the wrong name has been chosen. >> >> >From 4.6.4 sh:xor >> "Note that despite the name, the semantics of sh:xor for cases with 3 or more >> shapes are different from an exclusive or in the mathematical sense. The >> general definition of exclusive or makes it true only when an odd number of >> inputs are true, while the SHACL definition of sh:xor relies on exactly one >> semantics." >> >> >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> Nuance Communications >> > >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 03:27:38 UTC