- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:47:01 -0800
- To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
The working group needs to provide a description of how compliance testing for SHACL will work. As the result of SHACL validation can be an RDF graph the testing methodology needs to be abe to determine whether this graph is consistent with the requirements placed on it by SHACL. Otherwise it will not be possible to either determine whether a SHACL implementation conforms to the SHACL specification or whether SHACL implementations are interoperable. As the mandated behaviour of SHACL implementations includes behaviour that might not show up in final results the testing methodology needs to be sensitive to the internal behaviour of implementations. Otherwise it will not be possible to determine whether a SHACL implementation conforms to the SHACL specification. The working group needs to provide criteria for acceptance of tests. Several reasonable tests have been proposed and have been rejected by members of the working group. Therefore the criteria for acceptance of tests need to be made clear before advancement to Candidate Recommendation status. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 14:49:10 UTC