- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:12:02 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
It certainly does seem that none of the employers of members of the working group consider SHACL important enough to make it a priority. That's a very bad sign for the working group. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications On 02/16/2017 05:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I believe the most recent discussion on this topic happened in this meeting: > > https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html > > Sorry I am unable to sift through all past meeting minutes or the thousands of > emails that this WG has produced. I still do have a day job and plan to keep > it. You are welcome to use internet search or the archives yourself. > > Holger > >
Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 15:12:38 UTC