- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:39:58 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
The WG has decided to add a paragraph explaining that EXISTS should currently be used with care, see https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/c769634adc7de782209ed3da7e464a6be48b9932 Holger On 8/02/2017 7:33, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > What is the behaviour of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS? > > Is it the broken definition of EXISTS from the SPARQL document? Is it some > particular fixed version of EXISTS? Is it undefined? Or is EXISTS not to be > used in SPARQL-based constraint components? > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications >
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 23:40:34 UTC