W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:39:58 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <fca5a756-7b77-6fdd-3643-fc93b9f17fcf@topquadrant.com>
The WG has decided to add a paragraph explaining that EXISTS should 
currently be used with care, see



On 8/02/2017 7:33, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> What is the behaviour of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS?
> Is it the broken definition of EXISTS from the SPARQL document?  Is it some
> particular fixed version of EXISTS?  Is it undefined?  Or is EXISTS not to be
> used in SPARQL-based constraint components?
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 23:40:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC