Re: behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS

The WG has decided to add a paragraph explaining that EXISTS should 
currently be used with care, see


On 8/02/2017 7:33, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> What is the behaviour of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS?
> Is it the broken definition of EXISTS from the SPARQL document?  Is it some
> particular fixed version of EXISTS?  Is it undefined?  Or is EXISTS not to be
> used in SPARQL-based constraint components?
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 23:40:34 UTC