W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: information lacking for closed issues

From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:34:08 -0500
Cc: "<public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Message-Id: <365F4504-222B-44DA-B2D5-A10A5F2DE123@topquadrant.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
On this particular issue, WG discussed the topic during 1/25/2016 meeting. I brought it up. You can see the topic towards the end of the meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html>. It was agreed that the definition needed work.

Dimitris created an issue after the meeting. 

WG members iterated over a few drafts during the week that followed. Some of the iterations and surrounding discussions are in the e-mails attached to that issue.

Then, during the meeting of 2/1/2017, the issue was formally opened. The final result that was (and is) in the section 2.1 was presented for the WG vote and approved, closing the issue.
 

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Issues that have been recently closed are missing information about what was
> done to address the issue.
> 
> For example,
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/220
> does not say what was done to resolve it.
> 
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> 


Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 19:35:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC