- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:44:33 +1000
- To: Stephane Fellah <stephanef@imagemattersllc.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Message-Id: <3AC200C0-45B5-419C-BF57-DF42C40C67B6@topquadrant.com>
Hi Stephane, My whole focus right now is on getting SHACL to CR status before end of March. That is a critical deadline. I would suggest why don't you start such an open project and announce it here. I am sure some people (myself included) will provide feedback. Holger Sent from my iPad > On 25 Feb 2017, at 00:45, Stephane Fellah <stephanef@imagemattersllc.com> wrote: > > Holger, > > I love the idea of having these SHACL shapes repository as open source projects. I am keen to help building the one for OWL. I just wanted to make sure this was not done by anyone else. Would you be interested to help on this effort ? > > Regards > Stephane > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: >> FWIW I agree these would be great SHACL shapes graphs to have, e.g. as open source projects. There has been similar work in the past happening for SKOS using SPIN. Many other popular vocabularies such as RDF Data Cubes also define constraints that have so far not been captured in an executable form. See >> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S21:_SKOS_Constraints >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S22:_RDF_Data_Cube_Constraints >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S23:_schema.org_Constraints >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S30:_PROV_Constraints >> >> Plenty of interesting projects in this space... >> >> Regarding OWL, is there a definite list of syntax rules somewhere that could be tested? I am also wondering whether the OWL W3C Working Group had made such a checker mandatory for OWL implementations (as Peter requests we make mandatory for SHACL). >> >> Thanks, >> Holger >> >> >> >>> On 24/02/2017 4:43, Stephane Fellah wrote: >>> I am trying to use SHACL to validate OWL 2 ontologies to enforce proper encoding of OWL in RDF. Is there any work done in this area ? Is it feasible ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> -- >>> Stephane Fellah >>> Chief Knowledge Scientist >>> Image Matters LLC >>> Office: +(703) 669 5510 >>> Cell: 703 431 9420 >> > > > > -- > Stephane Fellah > Chief Knowledge Scientist > Image Matters LLC > Office: +(703) 669 5510 > Cell: 703 431 9420
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2017 03:51:10 UTC