Re: SHACL draft ready for review

Hi,

Thank you for the answer.

> > SHACL List
> >
> > and the list does not have itself as a value of the property path 
> rdf:rest+ in G.
> >
> > -- and rdf:first ?
>
> I don't see why rdf:first would be relevant here (in the definition of 
> non-recursive lists). rdf:first is just a member of the list. Could 
> you clarify if I am missing something?

[ sh:path  _:b ]

_:b rdf:first _:b ;
_:b rdf:rest rdf:nil .



Olivier