Re: SHACL draft ready for review

From: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:36:35 +0100 To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org Message-ID: <589AF4B3.9010501@inria.fr> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC

Hi,

Thank you for the answer.

> > SHACL List
> >
> > and the list does not have itself as a value of the property path 
> rdf:rest+ in G.
> >
> > -- and rdf:first ?
>
> I don't see why rdf:first would be relevant here (in the definition of 
> non-recursive lists). rdf:first is just a member of the list. Could 
> you clarify if I am missing something?

[ sh:path  _:b ]

_:b rdf:first _:b ;
_:b rdf:rest rdf:nil .

Olivier