qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint

> >
> >
> > There is no systematic definition of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint
>
> This is just a "flag" that IMHO doesn't require further definitions 
> beside the relationship with sh:qualifiedValueShape. There are syntax 
> rules however.

I think that qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint deserves a definition as all 
other statements.


Olivier