- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:33:56 -0800
- To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
What is the behaviour of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS? Is it the broken definition of EXISTS from the SPARQL document? Is it some particular fixed version of EXISTS? Is it undefined? Or is EXISTS not to be used in SPARQL-based constraint components? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 23:12:02 UTC