W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

behavior of SPARQL-based constraint components using EXISTS

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:33:56 -0800
To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2c1ee534-bb2c-0328-5b85-d4ed79df9ebb@gmail.com>
What is the behaviour of SPARQL-based constraint components that use EXISTS?

Is it the broken definition of EXISTS from the SPARQL document?  Is it some
particular fixed version of EXISTS?  Is it undefined?  Or is EXISTS not to be
used in SPARQL-based constraint components?

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 23:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC