Re: status of SHACL-SPARQL

On 23/02/2017 14:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> SHACL-SPARQL continues to have problems, in particular with pre-binding.

Is there anybody else here who sees problems with our definition of 
pre-binding? Please let us know.

     See Appendix A of http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#pre-binding

Related discussion: 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-exists/2017Feb/thread.html

Thanks,
Holger


>
> If SHACL-SPARQL was split off into a separate document from SHACL Core then
> these problems would not prevent SHACL Core from progressing to the next
> maturity level.  However, in the current situation problems with SHACL-SPARQL
> are problems of SHACL as a whole, and could prevent all of SHACL from
> progressing to the next maturity level.
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>