- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:54:36 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
On 23/02/2017 14:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> SHACL-SPARQL continues to have problems, in particular with pre-binding.
Is there anybody else here who sees problems with our definition of
pre-binding? Please let us know.
See Appendix A of http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#pre-binding
Related discussion:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sparql-exists/2017Feb/thread.html
Thanks,
Holger
>
> If SHACL-SPARQL was split off into a separate document from SHACL Core then
> these problems would not prevent SHACL Core from progressing to the next
> maturity level. However, in the current situation problems with SHACL-SPARQL
> are problems of SHACL as a whole, and could prevent all of SHACL from
> progressing to the next maturity level.
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>
Received on Friday, 24 February 2017 03:22:56 UTC