Re: status of SHACL-SPARQL

On 23/02/2017 14:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> SHACL-SPARQL continues to have problems, in particular with pre-binding.

Is there anybody else here who sees problems with our definition of 
pre-binding? Please let us know.

     See Appendix A of

Related discussion:


> If SHACL-SPARQL was split off into a separate document from SHACL Core then
> these problems would not prevent SHACL Core from progressing to the next
> maturity level.  However, in the current situation problems with SHACL-SPARQL
> are problems of SHACL as a whole, and could prevent all of SHACL from
> progressing to the next maturity level.
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications

Received on Friday, 24 February 2017 03:22:56 UTC