Re: SHACL for OWL2

Holger,

I love the idea of having these SHACL shapes repository as open source
projects. I am keen to help building the one for OWL. I just wanted to make
sure this was not done by anyone else. Would you be interested to help on
this effort ?

Regards
Stephane

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
wrote:

> FWIW I agree these would be great SHACL shapes graphs to have, e.g. as
> open source projects. There has been similar work in the past happening for
> SKOS using SPIN. Many other popular vocabularies such as RDF Data Cubes
> also define constraints that have so far not been captured in an executable
> form. See
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S21:_
> SKOS_Constraints
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S22:_
> RDF_Data_Cube_Constraints
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S23:_
> schema.org_Constraints
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S30:_
> PROV_Constraints
>
> Plenty of interesting projects in this space...
>
> Regarding OWL, is there a definite list of syntax rules somewhere that
> could be tested? I am also wondering whether the OWL W3C Working Group had
> made such a checker mandatory for OWL implementations (as Peter requests we
> make mandatory for SHACL).
>
> Thanks,
> Holger
>
>
>
> On 24/02/2017 4:43, Stephane Fellah wrote:
>
> I am trying to use SHACL to validate OWL 2 ontologies to enforce proper
> encoding of OWL in RDF. Is there any work done in this area ? Is it
> feasible ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Stephane Fellah
> Chief  Knowledge Scientist
> Image Matters LLC
> Office: +(703) 669 5510 <(703)%20669-5510>
> Cell: 703 431 9420 <(703)%20431-9420>
>
>
>


-- 
Stephane Fellah
Chief  Knowledge Scientist
Image Matters LLC
Office: +(703) 669 5510
Cell: 703 431 9420