- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:50:27 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
The result looks better. However the change in the document is not a clarification, but instead a fix to part of SHACL. Further, the change is incorrectly described in the revision history. Has the working group signed off on this change to SHACL? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications On 02/07/2017 05:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Right, this detail got lost in the refactoring when we removed the dependency > on EXISTS. > > I have added clarification here: > > https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/57f407027745663ffb6bcd593152aeb5835e530f > > > Thanks > Holger > > > On 7/02/2017 17:44, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> Section 6.3 does not correctly describe the execution semantics of ASK-based >> validators. ASK queries do not return solutions. >> >> peter >> >> >> On 02/06/2017 11:25 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>> Section 6.2 is about the syntax only. The validation semantics are explained >>> in 6.3. >>> >>> Holger >>> >>> >>> On 7/02/2017 16:34, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>> It appears that the non-normative boundary is one paragraph too early in >>>> Section 6.2.3.2. >>>> >>>> peter >>>> >>> > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:51:04 UTC