W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:50:27 -0800
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <076ec796-954a-ff11-be70-fa23ec5a4455@gmail.com>
The result looks better.  However the change in the document is not a
clarification, but instead a fix to part of SHACL.  Further, the change is
incorrectly described in the revision history.

Has the working group signed off on this change to SHACL?

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications

On 02/07/2017 05:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Right, this detail got lost in the refactoring when we removed the dependency
> on EXISTS.
> 
> I have added clarification here:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/57f407027745663ffb6bcd593152aeb5835e530f
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Holger
> 
> 
> On 7/02/2017 17:44, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> Section 6.3 does not correctly describe the execution semantics of ASK-based
>> validators.  ASK queries do not return solutions.
>>
>> peter
>>
>>
>> On 02/06/2017 11:25 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>> Section 6.2 is about the syntax only. The validation semantics are explained
>>> in 6.3.
>>>
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/02/2017 16:34, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>> It appears that the non-normative boundary is one paragraph too early in
>>>> Section 6.2.3.2.
>>>>
>>>> peter
>>>>
>>>
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:51:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC