W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: information lacking for closed issues

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:47:09 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <f9b4283e-2455-d6cd-250e-2cec240669ae@topquadrant.com>
Almost all closed issues now have a note pointing at their resolution. 
We will try to keep these up to date moving forward.

Holger


On 10/02/2017 5:36, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Yes, yes, something was done, I agree.
>
> My point is that the issue should have links to what was done and the
> rationale for doing this (including a link to the meeting where the decision
> was made).
>
> peter
>
>
> On 02/09/2017 11:34 AM, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>> On this particular issue, WG discussed the topic during 1/25/2016 meeting. I
>> brought it up. You can see the topic towards the end of the meeting
>> minutes https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html. It was agreed that
>> the definition needed work.
>>
>> Dimitris created an issue after the meeting.
>>
>> WG members iterated over a few drafts during the week that followed. Some of
>> the iterations and surrounding discussions are in the e-mails attached to that
>> issue.
>>
>> Then, during the meeting of 2/1/2017, the issue was formally opened. The final
>> result that was (and is) in the section 2.1 was presented for the WG vote and
>> approved, closing the issue.
>>   
>>
>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Issues that have been recently closed are missing information about what was
>>> done to address the issue.
>>>
>>> For example,
>>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/220
>>> does not say what was done to resolve it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>>>
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 23:47:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC