- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:47:09 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Almost all closed issues now have a note pointing at their resolution. We will try to keep these up to date moving forward. Holger On 10/02/2017 5:36, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Yes, yes, something was done, I agree. > > My point is that the issue should have links to what was done and the > rationale for doing this (including a link to the meeting where the decision > was made). > > peter > > > On 02/09/2017 11:34 AM, Irene Polikoff wrote: >> On this particular issue, WG discussed the topic during 1/25/2016 meeting. I >> brought it up. You can see the topic towards the end of the meeting >> minutes https://www.w3.org/2017/01/25-shapes-minutes.html. It was agreed that >> the definition needed work. >> >> Dimitris created an issue after the meeting. >> >> WG members iterated over a few drafts during the week that followed. Some of >> the iterations and surrounding discussions are in the e-mails attached to that >> issue. >> >> Then, during the meeting of 2/1/2017, the issue was formally opened. The final >> result that was (and is) in the section 2.1 was presented for the WG vote and >> approved, closing the issue. >> >> >>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Issues that have been recently closed are missing information about what was >>> done to address the issue. >>> >>> For example, >>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/220 >>> does not say what was done to resolve it. >>> >>> >>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>>
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 23:47:44 UTC