W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: SHACL for OWL2

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:08:08 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <ae27c0f4-9b55-8881-73e0-8862a67b481c@topquadrant.com>
FWIW I agree these would be great SHACL shapes graphs to have, e.g. as 
open source projects. There has been similar work in the past happening 
for SKOS using SPIN. Many other popular vocabularies such as RDF Data 
Cubes also define constraints that have so far not been captured in an 
executable form. See

https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S21:_SKOS_Constraints
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S22:_RDF_Data_Cube_Constraints
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S23:_schema.org_Constraints
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/User_Stories#S30:_PROV_Constraints

Plenty of interesting projects in this space...

Regarding OWL, is there a definite list of syntax rules somewhere that 
could be tested? I am also wondering whether the OWL W3C Working Group 
had made such a checker mandatory for OWL implementations (as Peter 
requests we make mandatory for SHACL).

Thanks,
Holger


On 24/02/2017 4:43, Stephane Fellah wrote:
> I am trying to use SHACL to validate OWL 2 ontologies to enforce 
> proper encoding of OWL in RDF. Is there any work done in this area ? 
> Is it feasible ?
>
> Regards
>
> -- 
> Stephane Fellah
> Chief  Knowledge Scientist
> Image Matters LLC
> Office: +(703) 669 5510
> Cell: 703 431 9420
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 23:08:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC