W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > February 2017

Re: probably-editorial issue in Section 6.2.3.2 - no longer editorial

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:16:11 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <0b4484b7-7463-0c07-4fd8-8438c4ffb47f@topquadrant.com>
Right, this detail got lost in the refactoring when we removed the 
dependency on EXISTS.

I have added clarification here:

https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/57f407027745663ffb6bcd593152aeb5835e530f

Thanks
Holger


On 7/02/2017 17:44, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Section 6.3 does not correctly describe the execution semantics of ASK-based
> validators.  ASK queries do not return solutions.
>
> peter
>
>
> On 02/06/2017 11:25 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> Section 6.2 is about the syntax only. The validation semantics are explained
>> in 6.3.
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>> On 7/02/2017 16:34, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> It appears that the non-normative boundary is one paragraph too early in
>>> Section 6.2.3.2.
>>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 01:16:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:48 UTC