public-grddl-wg@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• regrets for March 7 Ronald P. Reck
• Apologies and regrets for 7th of March Fabien Gandon
• late to telecon Ronald P. Reck
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Dan Connolly
• Regrets for 2007-02-28 Danny Ayers
• Today's call Ian Davis
• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? Simone Onofri
• Re: HP review for LC (spec_lean normative extract) Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Simone Onofri
• Re: HP review for LC (spec_lean normative extract) Dan Connolly
• HP review for LC Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Murray Maloney
• Re: Reviews for GRDDL Spec? Murray Maloney
• Agenda for GRDDL WG Meeting Feb 28 2007 11:00 EST Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Dan Connolly
• Reviews for GRDDL Spec? Harry Halpin
• The Chair wants *you* to take the GRDDL end-game survey Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Dan Connolly
• GRDDL for Metalink, anyone? Dan Connolly

Monday, 26 February 2007

• Regrets for next teleconference Simone Onofri

Sunday, 25 February 2007

• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? Dan Connolly

Saturday, 24 February 2007

• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? Harry Halpin
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? Harry Halpin
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? Chimezie Ogbuji
• RE: Sending Docs to Rec? Chimezie Ogbuji

Friday, 23 February 2007

• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) Fabien Gandon

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) Fabien Gandon
• Re: Comments on Use Cases draft (1-5) Fabien Gandon
• Re: Minor editorial : Use Case titles not consistent Fabien Gandon
• Re: Use Cases review Fabien Gandon
• RE: Sending Docs to Rec? McBride, Brian
• RE: GRDDL WD comments McBride, Brian
• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL Murray Maloney
• HTTP Profile draft not stable in the coming weeks/months (#issue-http-header-links) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL WD comments Dan Connolly
• Re: Sending Docs to Rec? Murray Maloney
• GRDDL WD comments Murray Maloney
• RE: GRDDL-aware GRDDL Clark, John
• Sending Docs to Rec? Harry Halpin
• Re: comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec Simone Onofri
• RDFa example in Primer (was Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO)). Fabien Gandon
• Re: comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Dan Connolly
• comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec Simone Onofri
• Minutes from 2007-02-21 WG Telecon (attached) Chimezie Ogbuji
• comments (editorial) on GRDDL primer Simone Onofri
• regrets for today Ronald P. Reck
• Regrets Ian Davis
• Re: HL7 XML example - second attempt / revision Chimezie Ogbuji
• HL7 XML example - second attempt / revision Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO) Harry Halpin
• Re: Sets of related test cases (hg admin) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Schedule and IETF - Working Draft/Last Call status Harry Halpin
• Test-cases as Rec-track Document Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL end-game survey Harry Halpin
• Re: Sets of related test cases (hg admin) Dan Connolly
• GRDDL end-game survey Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Murray Maloney
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• RE: Sets of related test cases Clark, John
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Murray Maloney
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Draft spec text for HTTP Headers Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) Danny Ayers
• Re: GRDDL-aware GRDDL Dan Connolly
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) Danny Ayers
• GRDDL-aware GRDDL Murray Maloney
• agenda GRDDL WG weekly 21 Feb in progress Dan Connolly
• RE: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) McBride, Brian
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) McBride, Brian
• Re: GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) (#issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) Dan Connolly

Monday, 19 February 2007

• GRDDL-aware agents (Was Re: "GRDDL Agents" ...) Murray Maloney
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Harry Halpin
• Re: Some spec comments (defn transformation property etc.) Dan Connolly
• Re: Some spec comments (to .xsl or not to .xsl?) Dan Connolly
• Re: Action to respond to jjc Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section (#issue-whichlangs, #issue-output-formats) Dan Connolly
• Primer version 1.43 Ian Davis
• Updated primer Ian Davis
• RE: Primer comments Ian Davis
• Action to respond to jjc Ian Davis
• Some spec comments McBride, Brian
• RE: httpHeaders test McBride, Brian
• httpHeaders test McBride, Brian
• RE: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) McBride, Brian
• Re: Spec section 9 (GRDDL Vocabulary) Dan Connolly
• Spec section 9 McBride, Brian
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) McBride, Brian
• RE: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Clark, John

Sunday, 18 February 2007

• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Murray Maloney

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Harry Halpin
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Murray Maloney
• grddl-client, grddl-tests hg repositories moved/upgraded Dan Connolly
• "GRDDL Agents" section, normative security text for review (# issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Re: comments on spec Dan Connolly
• RE: Sets of related test cases Clark, John
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* Ben Adida
• Re: Sets of related test cases Dan Connolly

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Minutes for 2007-02-14 GRDDL WG meeting Clark, John
• Sets of related test cases Clark, John
• Re: GRDDL Labels Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• GRDDL Labels Simone Onofri
• issue-mt-ns: McBride, Brian
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? Simone Onofri
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? Danny Ayers
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? Danny Ayers
• Re: Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? Brian Suda
• Comments on Primer draft (NO-GO) Danny Ayers
• Primer review : grokXFN.xsl broken? Danny Ayers
• Comments on Use Cases draft (final part) Danny Ayers
• RE: RDFa in Primer Ian Davis

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• Re: Spec review Dan Connolly
• RE: Use Cases review Dan Connolly
• Re: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) Harry Halpin
• Comments on Use Cases draft (1-5) Danny Ayers
• Spec review Clark, John
• Minor editorial : Use Case titles not consistent Danny Ayers
• Agenda for GRDDL WG Meeting: Feb 14th 11:00 ET Harry Halpin
• detailed security considerations (#issue-conformance-labels) Dan Connolly
• Re: Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon Harry Halpin
• Regrets for GRDDL WG telecon Chimezie Ogbuji

Monday, 12 February 2007

• Re: Comments on draft spec Danny Ayers
• Re: Comments on draft spec (intro wordsmithing, ns rule bug) Danny Ayers
• Re: Comments on draft spec Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on draft spec (intro wordsmithing, ns rule bug) Dan Connolly
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case Harry Halpin
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case Harry Halpin
• RE: Use Cases review Clark, John
• Re: Checked in HL7 use case Dan Connolly
• Re: Spec review: suggested addition re. recursion Dan Connolly
• Re: "application/xml" media type test for RDF source documents finished Dan Connolly
• Re: Use Cases review Dan Connolly
• Re: #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute Ivan Herman
• RE: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) McBride, Brian
• Re: RDFa in Primer Harry Halpin
• Re: RDFa in Primer Ben Adida
• RDFa in Primer Harry Halpin
• Checked in HL7 use case Harry Halpin
• "application/xml" media type test for RDF source documents finished Harry Halpin
• Checked HTTP Header Use-Case into Scenario Gallery Document Harry Halpin

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• Take 2: GRDDL Minutes Feb 7th Harry Halpin
• GRDDL minutes Feb 7th Harry Halpin
• Comments on draft spec Danny Ayers
• Spec review: suggested addition re. recursion Danny Ayers
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* Fabien Gandon
• Re: RDFa example with role attibute *IMPORTANT* Ben Adida
• Viewing RDFa in your examples. Fabien Gandon
• RDFa example with role attibute Fabien Gandon
• Re: Use-case Revisions. Fabien Gandon
• Re: Use Cases review Fabien Gandon
• Re: http-link-header in GRDDL Harry Halpin
• Re: #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? Chimezie Ogbuji
• #grddlonrdf test-case: approve? Harry Halpin

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL.py patch Dan Connolly
• GRDDL.py patch Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: testcase #grddlonrdf1 complete Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Simone Onofri
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Ben Adida
• testcase #grddlonrdf1 complete Harry Halpin
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Simone Onofri
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Simone Onofri

Friday, 9 February 2007

• langconneg test case done Harry Halpin
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Ben Adida
• Re: Best way to embed Semantic Data Harry Halpin
• Best way to embed Semantic Data Simone Onofri
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Dan Connolly
• Re: multipleRepresentations test case (and the XHTML Family) Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL Link header design alternatives (#issue-http-header-links) Harry Halpin
• SemWeb Co-ordination Group advice on IETF and HTTP Headers in GRDDL Harry Halpin
• multipleRepresentations test case McBride, Brian
• GRDDL Link header design alternatives (#issue-http-header-links) Dan Connolly
• Use-case Revisions. Brian Suda
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Jeremy Carroll
• take care with cross-posting [was: GRDDL Link header ...] Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL Link header [was: SW Coordination Group Meeting agenda, 2007-02-08] Harry Halpin

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Ian Davis
• GRDDL WG Minutes from 7 Feb 2007 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: GRDDL and IETF: Need "HTTP Header Linking" Graham Klyne
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Jeremy Carroll
• http-link-header in GRDDL Danny Ayers

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Re: Quick question re HTTP Header Ian Davis
• Quick question re HTTP Header Harry Halpin
• GRDDL and IETF: Need "HTTP Header Linking" Harry Halpin
• RE: Primer comments Ian Davis
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Dan Connolly
• Re: FW: HTTP Header Use Case Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example Harry Halpin
• comments on spec Ronald P. Reck
• Re: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example Ben Adida
• RE: Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example Ian Davis
• Primer: Updated Query, RDFa example Harry Halpin
• Use Cases review Clark, John
• RE: Meeting Agenda for Feb 7th GRDDL WG Meeting 11:00ET McBride, Brian
• Primer comments Ronald P. Reck
• Appendix: A GRDDL-aware Agent protocol trace Dan Connolly
• RE: Fixing SPARQL Query in GRDDL Primer Ian Davis
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) Dan Connolly
• Fixing SPARQL Query in GRDDL Primer Harry Halpin
• GRDDL Going to Last Call: Relevance to SAWSDL Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? (informative mechanical rules) Dan Connolly
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? Ian Davis
• [RDFa] Relationship between RDFa and GRDDL Ben Adida
• Re: HTTP Header Use Case Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft spec text for HTTP Headers Dan Connolly
• Meeting Agenda for Feb 7th GRDDL WG Meeting 11:00ET Harry Halpin
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: HTTP Header Precedence Dan Connolly
• Draft spec text for HTTP Headers Ian Davis
• HTTP Header Precedence Ian Davis
• HTTP Header Use Case Ian Davis
• Meeting Minutes for GRDDL WG Jan 31 Meeting Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? Harry Halpin
• Solving #issue-http-header-links Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call Harry Halpin
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call Ben Adida
• Re: GRDDL Going to Last Call Harry Halpin

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? Simone Onofri
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? Dan Connolly
• RE: GRDDL spec ready for release? McBride, Brian

Sunday, 4 February 2007

• Possible changes for GRDDL primer Ronald P. Reck

Friday, 2 February 2007

• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? Chimezie Ogbuji
• XMDP Profile for hCalendar Danny Ayers
• Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? Harry Halpin
• Re: Raptor (Redland) does GRDDL Dan Connolly
• GRDDL spec ready for release? Dan Connolly
• normative rules for the case of XSLT and RDF/XML [#issue-output-formats] Dan Connolly
• Re: Faithful Infoset paragraph Dan Connolly

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• Raptor (Redland) does GRDDL Danny Ayers

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 18:49:14 UTC