- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:38:09 -0500
- To: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Ian (and others feel free to weigh in)
In your original proposal you recommended us using the link header
[1], and in your draft spec you use both profile and link headers[2].
I'm a bit concerned because you said link header existed in HTTP RFC
2608 [3] but was deprecated in 2616 [4]. First, where exactly is the
text for the link header in RFC 2608 [3]? I can't find it.
Why was in deprecated?
And lastly, why use both "link" and "profile" headers if just a "link"
header will do? We've just decided to go ahead with the profile header,
but if I'm going to be dealing with the IETF I want more background on
why you made that choice.
thanks!
[1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jan/0087.html
[2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Feb/0020.html
[3]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2068.txt
[4]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
--
-harry
Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:38:25 UTC