- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:07:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, dave@dajobe.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Harry Halpin wrote: > Now, this is non-trivial, as we could propose to accept only 1 or any > combination of two of the above test-cases. If we do accept 1), for > example, then GRDDL results are non-additive. However, I do think it > makes sense, since I guess quite a few implementations are going to do 1) The way the GRDDL specification is (currently) written you can't mandate any of the options - it doesn't *require* the merging of all possible GRDDL results or any specific combination, it only defines each of the three as 'valid' GRDDL results. This makes testing for compliance a bit more complicated (as we've seen with the multiple output test scenarios as of late) but leaves implementors with the ability to follow their own policies. While on the subject, it seems that there is some ambiguity in whether or not profile GRDDL results are GRDDL results of the source documents that reference them It led to some recent confusion in #swig: <dajobe> see I get 136 triples for that, 'cos I import all of the profile document's triples into the main card.html doc. <chimezie> the profile document's triples should be a GRDDL result of that URI, no? * chimezie recalls some @@ indication about that in the spec <chimezie> huh.. when did that change? <dajobe> I'm not clear, I might have coded it wrong. <chimezie> i dont think you did actually.. <chimezie> [[[ <chimezie> if an information resource ?D has an XHTML representation whose profile attribute refers to ?PROFILE, then any GRDDL result of ?PROFILE is a GRDDL result of ?D <chimezie> ]]] <chimezie> followed by: <chimezie> @@no, profile results don't get merged in with ?D. and @@TODO: be more clear about multiple profiles. ... skip ... <dajobe> so profile results are just scraped for ?x grddl:profileTransformation ?y triples, others are dropped <chimezie> im just wondering what is the arch.. motivation for not including them as a result... <chimezie> it seems to be the same for ns docs <dajobe> they are mostly triples about different resources Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2007 03:22:47 UTC