- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:57:57 -0000
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> > I'm not griping; > > oops; did I get defensive? No. [...] > > > > <skulks a bit>I'm not very familiar with N3 rules and was > looking for > > something to explain to me how to interpret the ones in the spec. I > > don't think we can assume everyone knows how to read them. That > > doesn't > > seem to be the sort of thing in the mechanical rules > document though. > > OK, I wrote that bit too... > > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec_rules > 1.7 2007/02/20 01:38:07 > > I could still imagine yanking all that stuff out of the spec, but > I did manage to go over it with Michael Sperberg-McQueen > and Sandro Hawke and they did get it. That took almost an > hour by phone, but that was before the prose I just wrote > was available. > > Does the prose come close to explaining adequately? I think it does. I think that having the rules helps write the prose, but I think the rules kinda get in the way in the spec, at least for me, because I'm not familiar with N3 rules. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 08:00:46 UTC