- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:30:27 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Harry, I gather you're exploring GRDDL link design options that use only the already-registered Link: header field. This won't work: Link: <http://www.w3.org/2000/06/dc-extract/dc-extract.xsl>; rel="transformation"; profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view" The BNF in for Link[iana] doesn't have a profile param: Link = "Link" ":" #("<" URI ">" *( ";" link-param ) link-param = ( ( "rel" "=" relationship ) | ( "rev" "=" relationship ) | ( "title" "=" quoted-string ) | ( "anchor" "=" <"> URI <"> ) | ( link-extension ) ) The "profile" term could match link-extension, but then we're back to asking the IETF/IESG for an extension, and the Profile: header proposal[mnot] is more mature than anything we'd make up now. So I don't recommend re-opening the design discussion. [mnot] http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00.txt [iana] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2068.html which is cited from section 2.1.62. Header field: Link of HTTP Header Field Registrations December 2005 http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4229.txt which is the reference for Link in the permanent header registry. http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html which was established by IETF consensus recorded in Registration Procedures for Message Header Fields September 2004 http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3864.txt -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 17:30:33 UTC