- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:10:16 -0000
- To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "public-grddl-wg" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Harry, As best I can understand it, your argument is: 1. there are different audiences for the different docs 2. we have show that we take each audience seriously 3. ergo each document should be rec track. I don't see taking a document rec track as some sort of certificate of seriousness. It may be a certificate of stability and of consensus (so its worth implementing the spec). I speculate that what a CIO cares about is a) whether GRDDL will be good for his organization b) that it is an open standard with implementations. A spec that is a rec takes care of b. The primer explains what it does so takes care of a - whether or not it's a rec. Brian
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 08:10:29 UTC