- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:59:23 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, dave@dajobe.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 20:59 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > > Now that Chime's implementation passes one of these three tests, I'd > like someone else to try to see if they can get these test-cases to work > (cc'ing Jeremy, Dave). Pending their tests, I propose that we > approve tests these at the next telecon: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3.html#grddlonrdf1 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3.html#grddlonrdf2 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3.html#grddlonrdf3 Please let's not make aliases for the tests; let's use the media-type-independent names: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3#grddlonrdf1 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3#grddlonrdf2 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3#grddlonrdf3 > They cover the GRDDL 3 options of a GRDDL transform being on a RDF doc: > > 1) You just have as a result the GRDDL result > 2) You have as the result the GRDDL source document > 3) You have the merge of 1) and 2) > > Now, this is non-trivial, as we could propose to accept only 1 or any > combination of two of the above test-cases. If we do accept 1), for > example, then GRDDL results are non-additive. However, I do think it > makes sense, since I guess quite a few implementations are going to do 1) > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 12:59:45 UTC