- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:32:42 -0500 (EST)
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-grddl-wg Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, McBride, Brian wrote: > Have we drained the comments list of comments that, if they came in > again after last call, would force a second last call? > > How would folks feel about not taking all three docs rec track? The > requirements doc has done its job. Does publishing as a rec accomplish > anything? The primer isn't normative - so doesn't need to go through > the rec process and could be published as a note. This might reduce our > workload a bit. > > I'm feeling this timescale is a bit optimistic, but that's because I'm > feeling pushed to do the review of the spec I'd like to do before voting > positively for last call. I must say, I'm feeling the same concern about the time crunch of making all three documents published recommendations. Considering the charter of this working group spans various arenas: XHTML, Web architecture, Semantic Web architecture, informative use of rules, XML processing, etc - I think it is not realistic to expect to take all three documents through the recommendation track under the current time constraints. > > Brian > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-grddl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Harry Halpin >> Sent: 02 February 2007 06:27 >> To: Dan Connolly >> Cc: public-grddl-wg Group >> Subject: Re: GRDDL spec ready for release? >> >> >> Thanks so much for all the hard work on the Spec! I'd like at >> least one more reviewer besides Ron to give a good read >> before we release it as a Last Call. However, I do plan to >> propose all 3 docs go to last call after >> 2 more telecons to discuss the 2 remaining outstanding >> issues (#issue-http-header-links and #issue-mt-ns). >> >> On >> Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>> >>> It's been over 3 months since we released the GRDDL spec as a WD on >>> the http://www.w3.org/TR/ page. >>> >>> I added a couple significant chunks of normative material >> tonight. I >>> have maybe one more to do (the HTML profile analog of the XML >>> namespace transformation rules). >>> >>> The biggest editorial TODO is to fix the diagrams. >>> >>> My inspiration on the appendix about a sample implementation is >>> declining, now that Chime and Jeremy and Dave Beckett are >> passing most of the tests. >>> >>> So I'm just about ready to ship this thing. I wonder >> whether to ship >>> it this week or hold off and do a last call WD in a few weeks. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec >>> Revision 1.198 2007/02/02 03:32:53 >>> >>> >> >> -- >> --harry >> >> Harry Halpin >> Informatics, University of Edinburgh >> http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin >> >> > > Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 14:33:00 UTC